| At HF and even at VHF, broadband baluns are
generally used nowadays. These can be divided into two distinct categories:
voltage baluns and choke (or current) baluns. Examples of the two types of
baluns are shown in Fig 19.13. The voltage baluns of Fig 19.13A and Fig 19.13B
cause equal and opposite voltages to appear at the two output terminals,
relative to the voltage at the “cold” (coax cable ground) side of the input. If
the two antenna halves are perfectly balanced in impedance with respect to
ground, the balun will force the voltages to be equal, and the currents flowing
from the balun’s output terminals will be equal and opposite. No antenna current
will flow on the feed line, and the feed line will not radiate. If the load is
balanced, the 1:1 voltage balun of Fig 19.13A performs exactly the same function
as the current balun of Fig 19.13C, as there is no net current in winding b. If
the antenna isn’t perfectly symmetrical, however, unequal currents will appear
at the balun output, despite equal voltages, causing antenna current to flow on
the line, an undesirable condition leading to line radiation.
Another potential shortcoming of the 1:1 voltage
balun is that the windings appear across the line. If the windings have
insufficient inductive reactance (a common problem, particularly near the
lower-frequency end of its range), the system SWR will be degraded. The choke,
or current balun, is generally recommended for use at the junction of the
antenna and feed line. However, voltage baluns are still commonly used in this
application and serve a useful function if the user is aware of their
shortcomings. While voltage baluns cause equal and opposite voltages to
appear at their outputs, choke or current baluns force equal and opposite
currents to flow. The result is that currents radiated back onto the
transmission line by the antenna are effectively reduced, or “choked off,” even
if the antenna is not perfectly balanced. If winding inductive reactance becomes
marginal at lower frequencies, the balun’s ability to eliminate antenna currents
is reduced, but (for the 1:1 balun) no winding impedance appears across the
line.
For either type of balun, if induced current on the
line is a problem, perhaps because the feed line must be run in parallel with
the antenna for some portion of its length, additional baluns can be placed at
approximately 1/4-l intervals along the line. Current baluns are particularly
useful for feeding asymmetrical antennas with balanced line.

Broadband Balun Construction
Either type of broadband balun can be constructed
using a variety of techniques. Construction of choke (current) baluns is
described here. The objective is to obtain a high impedance for currents that
tend to flow on the line. Values from a few hundred to over a thousand ohms of
inductive reactance are readily achieved. These baluns work best with antennas
having resonant feed-point impedances less than 100 W or so (400 W for 4:1
baluns). This is because the winding inductive reactance must be high relative
to the antenna impedance for effective operation. A rule of thumb is that the
inductive reactance should be four times higher than the antenna impedance. High
impedances are difficult to achieve over a wide frequency range. Any sort of
transformer which is operated at impedances for which it was not designed can
fail, sometimes spectacularly.
The simplest construction method for a 1:1 balun
for coaxial line is simply to wind a portion of the line into a coil. See Fig
19.14. This type of choke balun is simple, cheap and effective. Currents on the
outside of the line encounter the coil’s impedance, while currents on the inside
are unaffected. A flat coil (like a coil of rope) shows a broad resonance that
easily covers three bands, making it reasonably effective over the entire HF
range. If particular problems are encountered on a single band, a coil that is
resonant at that band may be added. The coils shown in Table 19.4 were
constructed to have a high impedance at the indicated frequencies, as measured
with an impedance meter. Many other geometries can also be effective. This
construction technique is not effective with open-wire or twin-lead line because
of coupling between adjacent turns. An air-core 4:1 choke balun is shown in Fig
19.15.

Fig 19.14 — RF choke formed by coiling the feed
line at the point of connection to the antenna. The inductance of the choke
isolates the antenna from the remainder of the feed line.

Fig 19.15 — 4:1 air-core current balun. This balun
is rarely encountered nowadays, having been supplanted at HF by more compact
broadband balun transformers wound on toroidal cores.
Ferrite-core baluns can provide a high impedance
over the entire HF range. They may be wound either with two conductors in
bifilar fashion, or with a single coaxial cable. Rod or toroidal cores may be
used. Current through a choke balun winding is the “antenna current” on the
line; if the balun is effective, this current is small. Baluns used for
high-power operation should be tested by checking for temperature rise before
use. If the core overheats, add turns or use a larger or lower-loss core. It
also would be wise to investigate the imbalance causing such high line antenna
currents.
Type 72, 73 or 77 ferrite gives the greatest
impedance over the HF range. Type 43 ferrite has lower loss, but somewhat less
impedance. Core saturation is not a problem with these ferrites at HF; since
they overheat due to loss at flux levels well below saturation. The loss occurs
because there is insufficient inductive reactance at lower frequencies. Eight to
ten turns on a toroidal core or 10 to 15 turns on a rod are typical for the HF
range. Winding impedance increases approximately as the square of the number of
turns.
Another type of choke balun that is very effective
was originated by M. Walter Maxwell, W2DU. A number of ferrite toroids are
strung, like beads on a string, directly onto the coax where it is connected to
the antenna. The “bead” balun in Fig 19.16 consists of 50 FB73-2401 ferrite
beads slipped over a 1-ft length of RG-303 coax. The beads fit nicely over the
insulating jacket of the coax and occupy a total length of 9-1/2 inches. Twelve
FB-77-1024 or equivalent beads will come close to doing the same job using RG-8A
or RG-213 coax. Type-73 material is recommended for 1.8 to 30 MHz use, but
type-77 material may be substituted; use type-43 material for 30 to 250
MHz.

Fig 19.16 — W2DU bead balun consisting of 50
FB-73-2401 ferrite beads over a length of RG-303 coax. See text for
details.
The cores present a high impedance to any RF
current that would otherwise flow on the outside of the shield. The total
impedance is in approximate proportion to the stacked length of the cores. The
impedance stays fairly constant over a wide range of frequencies. Again,
70-series ferrites are a good choice for the HF range; use type-43 if heating is
a problem. Type-43 or -61 is the best choice for the VHF range. Cores of various
materials can be used in combination, permitting construction of baluns
effective over a very wide frequency range, such as from 2 to 250
MHz.
Table 19.4 — Effective Choke (Current
Baluns) Wind the indicated length of coaxial feed line into a coil (like a
coil of rope) and secure with electrical tape. The balun is most effective when
the coil is near the antenna. Lengths are not critical.
Single Band (Very Effective)
| MHz |
RG-213, RG-8 |
RG-58 |
| 3.5 |
22 ft (6,70m), 8 turns |
20 ft (6,10m), 6-8 turns |
| 7 |
22 ft (6,70m), 10 turns |
15 ft (4,57m), 6 turns |
| 10 |
12 ft (3,66m), 10 turns |
10 ft (3,05m), 7 turns |
| 14 |
10 ft (3,05m), 4 turns |
8 ft (2,44m), 8 turns |
| 21 |
8 ft (2,44m), 6-8 turns |
6 ft (1,83m), 8 turns |
| 28 |
6 ft (1,83m), 6-8 turns |
4 ft (1,22m), 6-8 turns |
Multiple Band
| MHz Freq |
RG-8, 58, 59, 8X, 213 |
| 3.5-30 |
10 ft (3,05m), 7 turns |
| 3.5-10 |
18 ft (5,49m), 9-10 turns |
| 14-30 |
8 ft (2,44m), 6-7 turns |
fonte: http://www.qsl.net/ta1dx/amator/broadband_baluns.htm
|